Why Open-Source Android Might Not Have Saved Huawei
Although Android's core code is open source, the hosts explain that Google's role as its primary US-based maintainer could bring even that project within export restrictions. Google argued that continued licensing would be safer because an unsupported Huawei fork could preserve vulnerabilities that Google could not fix.
- Open-source code may still face export-control questions
- Google is the primary Android Open Source Project maintainer
- Huawei had developed an internal operating-system contingency
- A replacement OS would lack Android's established application ecosystem
- Google argued that a separate fork could create additional security risks
“because Google is the primary maintainer of the Android open source project, and Google is a US corporation and entity, that actually makes even the…”
“they've been working on their own operating system internally since 2012.”