AAcquired
← All episodes
Alex Sherman27 September 2016

Inside the M&A Press with Bloomberg's Alex Sherman

3Frameworks
12Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster26:00

Most Deal Stories Are Not Timed as Strategic Leaks

Readers often infer elaborate motives from the exact moment an M&A scoop appears. Sherman says most timing is mundane: the reporter happened to reach the right person, finished writing later, or worked around ordinary personal and editorial scheduling.

  • Meetings can take weeks or months to arrange
  • A coincidental conversation may produce the decisive information
  • Writing and personal schedules can determine publication time
  • Sherman estimates only a minority of stories have strategic timing

“there's way less into that than you think, almost all the time.”

Alex Sherman · 27:00

“I would say 80% of the stories fall into that bucket, and 20% of the stories fall into there's some sort of reason for why…”

Alex Sherman · 27:00
#news cycle#strategic leaks#reporting#timing

Hot Take· 1

Hot Take48:30

Why Paywalls Threaten the Network Effects They Need to Monetize

The discussion considers whether mature social platforms could adopt subscriptions when user growth stalls. Ben Gilbert argues that charging users can drive participants away, making the product less valuable to everyone else and creating a negative feedback loop unlike a traditional newspaper paywall.

  • Wall Street historically valued social platforms through user growth
  • Subscriptions could diversify revenue after growth stalls
  • Departing users reduce the value available to remaining users
  • Traditional publications do not depend on the same interpersonal network effects

“traditional media doesn't require network effects.”

Ben Gilbert · 50:30

“if people start falling out of the ecosystem, you know, then everybody else is less incentivized to play to pay also.”

Ben Gilbert · 51:30
#subscriptions#network effects#social media#business models

Explainer· 5

Explainer09:30

Why Bloomberg Can Prioritize Accuracy Over Advertising

Bloomberg's journalism operates alongside a terminal business generating billions in recurring revenue. Alex Sherman argues that this financial structure gives the newsroom better incentives than advertising-dependent media because valuable reporting helps retain professional terminal subscribers.

  • The terminal business generates roughly $9 billion in annual revenue
  • Terminal subscriptions reduce dependence on advertising
  • M&A scoops directly support the core product by moving markets
  • Financial stability helped Sherman choose Bloomberg over competitors

“Bloomberg is in better financial shape than all of our competitors.”

Alex Sherman · 09:30

“if you're not serving the core function of this business, you're not essential to this business.”

Alex Sherman · 10:30
#bloomberg#media economics#terminals#journalism
Explainer11:30

How Social Media Eroded Bloomberg's 15-Minute News Advantage

Terminal customers receive Bloomberg news before the general public, historically creating a valuable trading window. Television broadcasts and subscribers tweeting headlines now transmit the substance almost instantly, although algorithmic traders can still profit from being first by fractions of a second.

  • Terminal customers receive news before public web readers
  • Bloomberg TV can expose headlines almost immediately
  • Subscribers can relay headlines through social media
  • Algorithmic trading concentrates the advantage into the first instant

“Bloomberg Terminal customers get our news 15 minutes before the rest of the world gets it.”

Alex Sherman · 11:30

“you just need to be first.”

Alex Sherman · 13:30
#market data#social media#algorithmic trading#bloomberg
Explainer24:30

What an M&A Story's Byline Order Can Reveal

The ordering and specialties of reporters on a scoop can hint at where its central information originated. A first byline usually identifies the reporter who obtained the key fact, while later bylines may show which company or counterparty was contacted for confirmation.

  • The first byline commonly reflects the source of the key information
  • A reporter's beat can indicate which party supplied the lead
  • Later bylines may represent confirmation from the counterparty
  • The pattern is common across major financial news organizations

“The first byline is typically where the main information has come from.”

Alex Sherman · 24:30

“you can sort of figure out where the the information came from.”

Alex Sherman · 26:00
#bylines#media literacy#m&a#sourcing
Explainer29:30

The Specialist PR Firms Behind Major M&A Transactions

Executives may not understand the coded signals in financial reporting, but specialist communications firms do. Companies entering a sale process often hire outside M&A PR advisers who interpret coverage, manage reporter relationships, and become a primary channel for checking facts.

  • Senior executives often rely on communications specialists
  • Major M&A PR firms employ people with deep media experience
  • Sale processes can shift communications away from internal PR
  • Reporters maintain recurring relationships with specialist firms

“many of them are former journalists.”

Alex Sherman · 30:00

“when one company decides it's going to sell itself or is engaged in a sales process, they then hire one of these external firms.”

Alex Sherman · 30:30
#public relations#dealmaking#media strategy#m&a
Explainer36:30

Why the Press Rarely Revisits Whether an Acquisition Worked

Post-acquisition analysis requires reconstructing strategy, culture, and financial performance after disclosure has often diminished. At Bloomberg, it also competes with the clearer commercial mandate to break actionable news capable of moving markets.

  • Comprehensive retrospective reporting is labor intensive
  • Acquired businesses often disappear into consolidated financial reporting
  • Historical analysis is less immediately actionable for traders
  • Newsrooms prioritize live transactions over long-form evaluation

“one of the reasons is it's much harder.”

Alex Sherman · 36:30

“The the the main reason is that my incentive here, particularly at Bloomberg, uh, is to move markets.”

Alex Sherman · 37:30
#acquisitions#media incentives#retrospectives#analysis

Story· 3

Story56:00

The 42-Minute Delay That Showed Twitter Could Beat a Newsroom

Sherman had sourced Comcast's acquisition of Time Warner Cable but needed Bloomberg's after-hours editorial machinery to approve sources, edit copy, prepare headlines, and authorize an alert. CNBC's David Faber received the information later but broke it immediately with a tweet, demonstrating how personal credibility and direct distribution can outrun institutional publishing systems.

  • Sherman had the information at least 42 minutes earlier
  • Bloomberg required several editorial and alerting approvals
  • A trusted reporter could publish instantly through Twitter
  • Institutional infrastructure remains important for salary, verification, and distribution

“Like, I don't need Bloomberg anymore. Like I could have broke this thing on my own.”

Alex Sherman · 58:00

“But but but of course I do need Bloomberg because they're paying my salary.”

Alex Sherman · 58:00
#twitter#breaking news#newsrooms#creator economy
Story59:30

The Accidental Tweet That Moved a Stock Five Percent

Sherman once tweeted deal information because he mistakenly believed the corresponding Bloomberg story had already published. Traders reacted within seconds and the stock moved roughly five percent, prompting Bloomberg to require reporters to include a published-story link before tweeting scoops.

  • A reporter's personal reputation can move markets
  • The tweet briefly preceded Bloomberg's own story
  • The incident triggered a new link-first tweeting policy
  • Bloomberg later created terminal-only links to preserve subscriber priority

“My my tweet was picked up by traders and the stock moved like five percent”

Alex Sherman · 1:00:00

“from now on, Bloomberg reporters can't tweet out stories until uh the story has a link involved to it”

Alex Sherman · 1:00:30
#market moving news#twitter#editorial policy#bloomberg
Story1:14:00

How Apple's Secrecy Extended Beyond Its Own Employees

While covering Apple's television ambitions, Sherman found that media companies were unusually unwilling to discuss negotiations because Apple had told them not to. He describes a level of fear and control he did not encounter when those companies discussed other commercial partners.

  • Apple explored television partnerships with major cable providers
  • Counterparties refused to discuss negotiations at Apple's request
  • The secrecy constrained companies Apple did not directly control
  • Sherman associates the intensity with the Steve Jobs and Katie Cotton era

“Apple, I can tell you from a reporter standpoint, is like uh sort of one of the few companies that acts as like the mafia.”

Alex Sherman · 1:14:00

“It was so difficult to get information from the media companies because they basically said like Apple told us not to say anything.”

Alex Sherman · 1:14:30
#apple#secrecy#media#negotiations

Tool· 1

Tool14:30

The Red Headline That Can Trigger a Market Reaction

Bloomberg highlights its biggest terminal stories in red, a presentation choice that may activate trader attention and automated systems. Editors sometimes withhold the red treatment when a report is nuanced, preliminary, historical, or otherwise likely to create an excessive reaction.

  • Major Bloomberg headlines appear in red on terminals
  • Red treatment is associated with large stock-price reactions
  • Editorial presentation can influence automated and human trading
  • Nuanced or dead deal talks may not warrant the strongest alert

“our biggest stories are are redheaded. They're literally red on the terminal.”

Alex Sherman · 14:30

“we will purposefully not redhead stories where we don't actually want to generate an enormous market reaction”

Alex Sherman · 15:30
#market impact#headlines#trading#editorial judgment

Takeaway· 1

Takeaway43:00

Why Counterfactual Deal Stories Keep Attracting Listeners

The hosts distinguish breaking news from narrative history and analysis. Acquired episodes about rejected or counterfactual deals can continue growing long after publication because audiences enjoy the drama of what happened and what might have been.

  • News relevance can create a short-lived download spike
  • Strong deal narratives retain value after the news cycle
  • Counterfactual acquisitions provide built-in dramatic tension
  • Some listeners enjoy the story despite having little interest in M&A

“people listen to us for the stories.”

David Rosenthal · 44:00

“it's this anti-history, you know, like what what the world could have been if Snapchat were part of Facebook.”

Ben Gilbert · 45:00
#storytelling#podcasts#counterfactuals#audience