❝Story08:30
Script on Friday, handshake by Sunday: how Super Pumped got its Travis
Koppelman and David Levine wrote the pilot and sent it to their agents, naming Gordon-Levitt as their only real choice. Agent Warren Zavala read it on Friday, sent it to Gordon-Levitt in New Zealand on Saturday, and by Sunday the three of them were on a call shaking hands virtually. Both sides stress how rare that is, and Gordon-Levitt credits the fact that Zavala almost never pushes him on anything.
- Koppelman and Levine wrote the pilot with Gordon-Levitt as first choice for TK
- Warren Zavala had been Gordon-Levitt's agent since he was 19 and was his first client
- Zavala's rare enthusiasm was the signal that made Gordon-Levitt read it immediately
- Koppelman compares it to a startup getting every angel and Series A investor it wanted
- The team got first choices across the whole cast, which compounded once Gordon-Levitt was attached
“Warren read the script on a Friday, sent it to Joe on Saturday in New Zealand. Joe read the script on Sunday, David Levine, Joe,…”
“with which he brought me Super Pumped because he knows that I hate almost everything.”
#casting#agents#hollywood#super pumped
❝Story16:30
The cost Bill Gurley paid, as Koppelman reads it
Koppelman knows Bill Gurley personally and is friendly with both Gurley and Marc Andreessen, which he jokes puts him in a club of about five people. He frames Gurley's dilemma as the show's third great moral question: leave Kalanick in place and risk the whole endeavour, or engineer the removal and permanently reshape how founders see you. Koppelman also argues that a venture capitalist can carry a drama at all because audiences are fascinated by people who put everything on the line.
- Koppelman is friendly with both Gurley and Andreessen, which he calls a rare position
- Gurley's choice: protect the endeavour or protect his standing with founders
- The show gives TK, Arianna and Gurley each their own moral question
- The hosts note how implausible a VC-as-lead-character would have seemed ten years earlier
- Koppelman's counter: Christian Bale played Michael Burry — audiences love people who bet it all
“which is which is the worse cost? Leaving this thing in place that might imperil the whole endeavor, but protecting the way that I'm thought…”
“we're fascinated by people who put it all on the line, man.”
#venture capital#bill gurley#moral dilemma#characters
❝Story18:30
Why Koppelman built a wall between his friendship with Gurley and the show
Asked how he weighed the source book against his own relationships with the real people, Koppelman says they deliberately did not talk to anyone in the show for the show. He told Gurley directly that nothing from their social conversations would appear, that everything would be sourced from Mike Isaac's book — and then a wall went up on both sides. He adds that he and Gurley mostly talk about Jason Isbell and rock and roll anyway.
- No interviews with the real people were conducted for the show itself
- Koppelman told Gurley explicitly that social conversations were off-limits as material
- Everything was sourced from Mike Isaac's book, giving one clean provenance chain
- The wall went up on both sides and stayed there
- Gordon-Levitt did speak to Kalanick's colleagues separately, for feel rather than facts
“Anything I may have heard from any conversation that I had with you socially is not in the show.”
“And then a wall went up on both sides and that's that.”
#sourcing#ethics#adaptation#bill gurley
❝Story32:00
The Eiffel Tower scene that made a well-researched host think they got duped
The show stages the famous Uber founding story as Travis remembers it, then lets the background fall away to reveal what actually happened. A host who had done a hundred hours of research for an Uber episode describes watching the Eiffel Tower version play and thinking the filmmakers had been fooled — before the reveal landed. Gordon-Levitt says that formal play was part of why he wanted in: taking a mainstream story and using non-mainstream filmmaking techniques.
- The show plays the apocryphal memory first, then dissolves it into the real version
- The hosts had already discovered the founding story was apocryphal in their own research
- The device turned an informed viewer's suspicion into a payoff
- Gordon-Levitt was drawn to the script partly because it played with form
- Messing with storytelling conventions is unusual on television, which was the appeal
“and then when it fades away and shows that indeed that was the apocryphal story I was like masterminds.”
“you do have a means of storytelling in the show where you're showing the way that Travis sort of remembers something happening, but it's of…”
#narrative device#uber origins#filmmaking#research
❝Story38:30
The author was in the writers' room 94 days out of 100
The project started with a Twitter DM: Mike Isaac asked Koppelman to read his book five months before publication. Twenty-five or fifty pages in, Koppelman told his partner it was their next thing, and they committed immediately — which is why Isaac stayed with them even when the whole town wanted it. Isaac then sat in the writers' room nearly every day as executive producer, and when the room needed to know what really happened, he would go check his notes and sometimes return with the actual source on the Zoom, off the record.
- Isaac DM'd Koppelman on Twitter before the book was published
- Koppelman committed right away, with no games on either side, and Isaac held firm
- Isaac attended roughly 94 of 100 days in the room and read every script
- He never revealed sources, but would consult his notes when the room pushed
- Sometimes the actual source would appear on the Zoom and speak off the record
“if we did 100 days in the room, Mike was there for 94 of the 100.”
“And he would go and he wouldn't reveal his sources, but he would go get his notes.”
#writers room#mike isaac#sourcing#adaptation
❝Story47:30
A bomb that became a classic, and a show he loved that was cancelled
Koppelman describes knowing months in advance that Runner Runner would land badly and that the reviewers would be right, which he calls the worst version. He contrasts it with his first film: hostile reviews in the two magazines that mattered a week before release, a theatrical bomb, then hundreds of millions on DVD and a classic he is asked to sequel daily twenty-five years later. Gordon-Levitt offers the mirror case in Mr. Corman — a show he made exactly to his taste, is proud of, and which was not renewed.
- Koppelman: when you know it's bad, it's bad — it does not turn around
- The hardest version is knowing six months out that a bomb is coming and that critics are right
- His first film bombed theatrically, then became a classic over 25 years
- The morning after the bad reviews he realised nobody could take away his ability to make things
- Gordon-Levitt made Mr. Corman to his own taste with Apple's backing; not enough people watched
“and 25 years later that movie's a classic, but at the time it was a bomb.”
“But then the next day I woke up and I I remember I clear thought, I can still write. They can't take away from me…”
#reception#failure#mr corman#reviews